Beyond the Number

Why Recognition is an Act of Belonging

Every December, Australia engages in a national ritual. We wait for a number.

For thousands of young people, the release of the ATAR is framed as a verdict. It is the moment the system tells them “who they are” and “what they are worth” in the eyes of the tertiary sector. But while we obsess over this single data point, we are ignoring a profound silence.

The ATAR measures a specific type of academic performance at a specific moment in time. It does not measure collaboration, care, cultural knowledge, leadership, or resilience. When a young person spends their teenage years building these capabilities—through sport, community work, caring for siblings, or creative projects—and the system offers no way to capture or value them, we aren’t just missing data.

We are telling them that those parts of themselves do not count.

You cannot belong to a system that does not see you

This is the core failure of our current “missing middle.” We often talk about recognition as a technical problem—a matter of credentials, badges, and transcripts. But new research suggests it is actually a human problem. Recognition is a determinant of health.

The Wellness of Being Seen

A groundbreaking study recently published in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA), titled “The Power of Recognising More,” flips the script on how we view assessment.

Co-authored by young people, the study found that when students feel “seen” for their broader skills—not just their test scores—it directly strengthens their subjective wellbeing and social connection. Conversely, when the system demands conformity to narrow academic metrics, it breeds anxiety and alienation.

The study’s conclusion is a call to arms for policymakers: “Young people must be well to learn well.”

This isn’t just about making students “feel good.” It is about the fundamental architecture of learning. The study reveals that when young people have their non-formal learning recognised—whether it’s leading a scout troop or managing a complex casual job—they develop a stronger “learning identity.” They see themselves as capable. They feel they belong.

If we want to fix the mental health crisis in our schools, we have to stop treating wellbeing and academic achievement as competing priorities. They are the same thing.

The $22 Billion Cost of Invisibility

For the economic rationalists who might dismiss “belonging” as a soft metric, the hard data is equally compelling.

New modelling from the Learning Creates Australia “Economics of Education” series puts a price tag on our current narrowness. The report estimates that better recognising and investing in the “social and emotional capabilities” of young Australians could unlock $22 billion in lifetime earnings.

Furthermore, the Economics of Effective Transitions report suggests that implementing broader, trusted credentials could generate between $2.1 and $5 billion annually in productivity gains by smoothing the friction between school and work.

Why? Because when we fail to recognise skills, we fail to use them. We have an economy crying out for adaptability, teamwork, and digital fluency, and a school system that is often too busy measuring content recall to notice that students already possess these capabilities.

We are leaving billions on the table, simply because we lack the “connective tissue” to make these skills visible.

The Global Shift: From Pipelines to Portfolios

Australia is not alone in this rethink. The global “signals of success” are changing.

• The OECD Learning Compass 2030 has explicitly linked “Student Agency” to wellbeing. It argues that students need to be co-authors of their own learning journey, not just passengers.

• The Mastery Transcript Consortium in the US is working with hundreds of schools to replace the A-F grade list with a “Mastery Record” that visualises skills, not just seat time.

• Big Picture Education Australia has pioneered the International Big Picture Learning Credential (IBPLC), a learner-profile model now accepted by 18 Australian universities. It proves that we don’t need to wait for permission to change the system; we can build the new road alongside the old one.

Recognition as Cultural Renewal

We need to stop thinking of recognition as a “certificate” at the end of a course. True recognition is relational. It is a feedback loop.

When a teacher validates a student’s perseverance, or a community mentor badges a student’s teamwork, they are building Self-Sovereign Learning Identity. They are handing the student the keys to their own story.

If we want a learning ecosystem that flows—rather than a pipeline that leaks—we must start by expanding what we value. We need systems that say to every young person: We see you. We value the whole of you. And you belong here.

Previous: From Pipelines to Living Learning Systems: Rethinking Readiness for a More Human Future

Next: While We Wait for Policy: The Case for Early Career Education